{"id":348,"date":"2026-10-09T00:39:10","date_gmt":"2026-10-09T00:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/chinese-manufacturer-produced-defective-custom-products-can-you-claim-a-refund\/"},"modified":"2026-10-09T00:39:10","modified_gmt":"2026-10-09T00:39:10","slug":"chinese-manufacturer-produced-defective-custom-products-can-you-claim-a-refund","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/chinese-manufacturer-produced-defective-custom-products-can-you-claim-a-refund\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese Manufacturer Produced Defective Custom Products: Can You Claim a Refund?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

When sourcing from Linyi<\/strong>, overseas companies should consider not only the contract itself but also the type of local supplier, the surrounding supply chain and the nature of the goods or services involved. Linyi is an important commercial and manufacturing center in Shandong with strong wholesale and industrial supply chains. Understanding this background can help a buyer identify potential problems at an earlier stage.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

<\/p>\n

A Chinese manufacturer has completed your custom order, but the products are defective. Perhaps the dimensions are wrong, the materials are inferior, the products fail testing, or the finished goods cannot perform the function you specified.<\/p>\n

You have already paid a deposit\u2014or even the full contract price. The manufacturer now offers repairs, promises to remake the products, or refuses to refund your money because the goods were made specifically for you.<\/p>\n

Can you demand a refund?<\/p>\n

Yes, a refund may be available, but defective custom products do not automatically entitle the buyer to recover the entire purchase price.<\/strong> The outcome depends on the contract, the seriousness of the defects, whether the products can still serve their intended purpose, the available evidence, and the remedies permitted under the applicable law.<\/p>\n

For foreign companies dealing with Chinese manufacturers, the practical challenge is not simply proving that something is wrong. It is establishing why the defect justifies the particular remedy being claimed.<\/p>\n

1. The Manufacturer Says: \u201cCustom Products Cannot Be Returned\u201d<\/h3>\n

This is one of the most common responses buyers encounter.<\/p>\n

A manufacturer may argue that the products were made according to the buyer’s individual requirements and cannot be resold to another customer. It may therefore refuse to accept a return or issue a refund.<\/p>\n

That argument does not, by itself, resolve the legal question.<\/p>\n

There is an important distinction between two situations:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • A change of mind:<\/strong> The buyer no longer wants products that were manufactured correctly according to the agreed specifications.<\/li>\n
  • A manufacturing breach:<\/strong> The products do not comply with the contract, approved specifications, samples, or other binding requirements.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    The fact that a product is customized may make resale and return logistics more complicated. It does not automatically excuse the manufacturer from contractual obligations.<\/p>\n

    Under the Chinese Civil Code, a seller must deliver goods that meet the agreed quality requirements. Where the delivered goods fail to meet those requirements, the buyer may have contractual remedies under Articles 582\u2013584 and Article 617, depending on the circumstances.<\/p>\n

    2. The First Question Is Not \u201cHow Much Did I Pay?\u201d<\/h3>\n

    The first question is whether the defect prevents the products from fulfilling the purpose for which they were ordered.<\/p>\n

    Consider three examples.<\/p>\n

    Example A: A minor cosmetic defect<\/strong><\/p>\n

    A batch of custom metal housings has small scratches that can be repaired at a modest cost. The products otherwise meet the technical requirements.<\/p>\n

    A full refund may be disproportionate. Repair, replacement of affected units, or a price reduction may be more realistic remedies.<\/p>\n

    Example B: A critical functional failure<\/strong><\/p>\n

    A manufacturer produces custom electrical components that repeatedly fail the agreed performance test. The components cannot be used in the buyer’s equipment, and repairing them would not reliably resolve the problem.<\/p>\n

    A claim for rejection, contract termination, and refund may be more supportable, depending on the contract and applicable law.<\/p>\n

    Example C: A mixed batch<\/strong><\/p>\n

    A manufacturer delivers 1,000 custom products. Testing shows that 180 fail a mandatory specification, while the remaining 820 pass.<\/p>\n

    The buyer must consider whether the defective units can be separated, whether the defect indicates a wider production problem, and whether the contract permits partial rejection or termination of the entire order.<\/p>\n

    The severity and consequences of the breach matter more than the label \u201cdefective.\u201d<\/p>\n

    3. When Can a Buyer Seek a Full Refund?<\/h3>\n

    A full refund is generally easier to justify when the breach is serious enough to defeat the contract’s purpose, or when the contract itself provides a relevant cancellation or refund right.<\/p>\n

    Article 610 of the Chinese Civil Code provides that where goods do not meet quality requirements and, as a result, the purpose of the contract cannot be achieved, the buyer may refuse to accept the goods or terminate the contract.<\/p>\n

    That rule can be important when custom products are unusable for their intended application.<\/p>\n

    Examples may include:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Custom machinery that cannot perform its essential function.<\/li>\n
    • Components that fail a mandatory safety or performance requirement.<\/li>\n
    • Products manufactured to fundamentally incorrect dimensions.<\/li>\n
    • Custom parts that cannot fit or operate with the equipment for which they were ordered.<\/li>\n
    • Products made from a materially different substance or grade where the specified material was essential.<\/li>\n
    • A batch with defects so extensive that reasonable correction is impractical.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      However, the legal test must be applied to the actual transaction. A disappointing result, a minor deviation, or a buyer’s preference for a different design does not necessarily justify termination of the entire contract.<\/p>\n

      The buyer should identify the agreed requirement, the actual deviation, and the practical consequences of that deviation.<\/p>\n

      4. What If the Products Can Be Repaired?<\/h3>\n

      Manufacturers frequently respond to complaints by offering to repair the products or produce replacements.<\/p>\n

      That proposal should be evaluated rather than accepted or rejected automatically.<\/p>\n

      Ask four questions:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Can the defect be corrected completely?<\/li>\n
      2. Can the manufacturer finish the work within a commercially acceptable period?<\/li>\n
      3. Will the repaired or replacement products satisfy the original requirements?<\/li>\n
      4. Who will pay for transportation, reinspection, installation, removal, and other necessary costs?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        For example, replacing a defective component may be a reasonable solution if the replacement can be delivered quickly and verified before use.<\/p>\n

        But if the products are intended for a project with a fixed opening date, a three-month replacement delay may create losses that a simple repair proposal does not address.<\/p>\n

        The buyer should also consider whether the manufacturer has already attempted repairs unsuccessfully. Repeated failed correction attempts may strengthen the practical case for seeking a different remedy, although the legal consequences depend on the contract and circumstances.<\/p>\n

        5. Can You Reject the Entire Order Because Some Products Are Defective?<\/h3>\n

        Not necessarily.<\/p>\n

        The answer depends on the nature of the defect, how the order is structured, whether the units are separable, and whether the unaffected products can reasonably be used.<\/p>\n

        Suppose a buyer ordered 500 customized components. Fifty have incorrect dimensions, while 450 conform to the agreed specifications.<\/p>\n

        There may be a basis to seek remedies for the 50 defective units without cancelling the entire order.<\/p>\n

        The position may be different if the 50 defective components reveal that the entire production batch was made using the wrong material or an unreliable manufacturing process.<\/p>\n

        The buyer should distinguish between:<\/p>\n

          \n
        • Defects confined to identifiable units.<\/li>\n
        • A recurring defect affecting a significant proportion of the batch.<\/li>\n
        • A systemic defect that may affect products that have not yet been tested.<\/li>\n
        • A defect that makes the entire order commercially unusable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          Before rejecting an entire shipment, preserve test results and obtain evidence supporting the scope of the problem. An unsupported assertion that \u201ceverything is defective\u201d can weaken an otherwise valid claim.<\/p>\n

          6. Custom Products That Cannot Be Resold<\/h3>\n

          Customization creates a practical complication: the manufacturer may have produced goods specifically for the buyer’s design, branding, dimensions, or intended use.<\/p>\n

          The manufacturer may argue that a refund would leave it with products that have no alternative market.<\/p>\n

          That commercial concern does not determine whether the manufacturer breached the contract. However, it may influence negotiations and the practical structure of a settlement.<\/p>\n

          For example, the parties might consider:<\/p>\n

            \n
          • A full refund against return of the goods.<\/li>\n
          • A partial refund while the buyer retains usable units.<\/li>\n
          • Replacement of defective units.<\/li>\n
          • Rework at the manufacturer’s expense.<\/li>\n
          • A refund combined with reimbursement of agreed additional costs.<\/li>\n
          • A negotiated settlement that accounts for the salvage value of the products.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            A buyer should not assume that retaining the products and recovering the entire price is automatically available. The treatment of the goods, return obligations, and any credit for retained value must be considered alongside the legal claim.<\/p>\n

            7. The Manufacturer Blames Your Specifications<\/h3>\n

            A manufacturer may argue that it produced the goods according to the information supplied by the buyer.<\/p>\n

            This can be a serious issue, particularly when the order involved custom engineering, prototypes, technical drawings, or several rounds of revisions.<\/p>\n

            The dispute may concern whether:<\/p>\n

              \n
            • The buyer supplied incorrect information.<\/li>\n
            • The manufacturer misunderstood the requirements.<\/li>\n
            • The manufacturer identified a technical problem but failed to warn the buyer.<\/li>\n
            • The buyer approved a prototype that already contained the relevant defect.<\/li>\n
            • The manufacturer changed the production method without authorization.<\/li>\n
            • The parties never agreed on the specification now being disputed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              The buyer should not rely exclusively on a general statement that the products are \u201cpoor quality.\u201d Identify the exact contractual requirement and show how the delivered goods differ from it.<\/p>\n

              If the manufacturer followed a specification supplied by the buyer, that fact may affect responsibility. It does not automatically resolve every issue, especially where the manufacturer had separate contractual duties or made representations about performance.<\/p>\n

              8. What Evidence Is Most Useful for a Refund Claim?<\/h3>\n

              The most useful evidence connects the contractual obligation to the actual defect and the loss.<\/p>\n

              For a custom-manufacturing dispute, prioritize the following:<\/p>\n

              The agreed requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n

                \n
              • Signed contract and purchase order.<\/li>\n
              • Final technical specifications.<\/li>\n
              • Approved drawings, samples, or prototypes.<\/li>\n
              • Applicable testing criteria.<\/li>\n
              • Written promises about performance or quality.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                The actual condition of the goods<\/strong><\/p>\n

                  \n
                • Dated photographs and videos.<\/li>\n
                • Inspection reports.<\/li>\n
                • Test results and measurement records.<\/li>\n
                • Batch numbers, serial numbers, and packaging labels.<\/li>\n
                • Records showing how samples were selected and tested.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  The manufacturer’s response<\/strong><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  • Emails and WeChat messages.<\/li>\n
                  • Admissions about production errors.<\/li>\n
                  • Promises to repair, replace, or refund.<\/li>\n
                  • Explanations for deviations from the specification.<\/li>\n
                  • Records of failed corrective attempts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                    The financial impact<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    • Payment records.<\/li>\n
                    • Inspection and storage costs.<\/li>\n
                    • Return or replacement freight quotations.<\/li>\n
                    • Rework estimates.<\/li>\n
                    • Reasonable costs incurred because the goods could not be used.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                      Preserve original electronic records where possible. If the goods may be needed for expert examination or court proceedings, avoid modifying, disposing of, or returning all the disputed products before considering how their condition can be reliably documented.<\/p>\n

                      9. Should You Stop Paying the Remaining Balance?<\/h3>\n

                      A buyer may be tempted to withhold all remaining payments immediately after discovering defects.<\/p>\n

                      That can be risky.<\/p>\n

                      The contract may specify payment milestones, acceptance procedures, inspection deadlines, or separate obligations for different batches. The buyer’s right to withhold payment depends on the contract and applicable law, including the relationship between the outstanding payment and the manufacturer’s breach.<\/p>\n

                      Before withholding a substantial balance, examine:<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      • Whether payment is conditional on inspection or acceptance.<\/li>\n
                      • Whether the contract permits payment suspension.<\/li>\n
                      • Whether the defect affects the relevant delivery or the entire order.<\/li>\n
                      • Whether the buyer has provided the required defect notice.<\/li>\n
                      • Whether the manufacturer has offered appropriate security or corrective action.<\/li>\n
                      • Whether withholding the payment could itself trigger a contractual claim.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                        A buyer should not treat the unpaid balance as automatic leverage without assessing the legal and commercial risks.<\/p>\n

                        10. How Much Can You Claim?<\/h3>\n

                        The amount recoverable may differ from the amount originally paid.<\/p>\n

                        Depending on the facts and applicable law, a claim may include one or more of the following:<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        • Refund of all or part of the price.<\/li>\n
                        • Repair or replacement costs.<\/li>\n
                        • Reasonable inspection expenses.<\/li>\n
                        • Necessary return or retransport costs.<\/li>\n
                        • Additional costs caused by the defective goods.<\/li>\n
                        • Other provable losses caused by the breach.<\/li>\n
                        • Contractual liquidated damages, where applicable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                          Article 584 of the Chinese Civil Code addresses compensation for losses caused by a breach, subject to legal limitations, including foreseeability at the time the contract was made.<\/p>\n

                          For instance, if defective components cause the buyer to pay another supplier for urgent replacement production, the additional cost may be relevant. But the buyer will need evidence of the expenditure, its connection to the breach, and why the cost was reasonable.<\/p>\n

                          Lost profits and downstream customer claims require particular care. They should not be added to a demand simply because the buyer suffered inconvenience or commercial pressure. Their recoverability depends on evidence, causation, contractual terms, and applicable legal rules.<\/p>\n

                          11. The Manufacturer Offers a Discount on the Next Order<\/h3>\n

                          A supplier may propose a discount on future purchases instead of refunding the current order.<\/p>\n

                          This may be commercially useful if the relationship is valuable and the buyer genuinely intends to place another order. It may be unsuitable if the buyer no longer trusts the manufacturer or needs cash to cover immediate losses.<\/p>\n

                          Before accepting such an offer, clarify:<\/p>\n

                            \n
                          • The exact value of the discount.<\/li>\n
                          • Whether another purchase is mandatory.<\/li>\n
                          • When the discount expires.<\/li>\n
                          • Whether the buyer must pay the full price first.<\/li>\n
                          • Whether the current dispute will be treated as fully settled.<\/li>\n
                          • Whether the agreement waives further claims.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                            A future discount is not equivalent to a cash refund. Compare its actual value with the amount at stake and the likelihood of placing another order.<\/p>\n

                            12. What If the Products Have Already Been Shipped Overseas?<\/h3>\n

                            If the goods are already in transit or have arrived in the buyer’s country, the cost of returning them may be substantial.<\/p>\n

                            Before agreeing to return the shipment, calculate the likely cost of:<\/p>\n

                              \n
                            • Unloading and inspection.<\/li>\n
                            • Storage.<\/li>\n
                            • Export or re-export formalities.<\/li>\n
                            • Freight and insurance.<\/li>\n
                            • Customs handling.<\/li>\n
                            • Return transport to China.<\/li>\n
                            • Replacement production and a second shipment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                              Depending on the circumstances, it may be more economical to negotiate a price reduction, local rework, replacement of specific parts, or another arrangement.<\/p>\n

                              The buyer should also check the contract’s delivery terms and risk-of-loss provisions. Transfer of transport risk does not necessarily eliminate the seller’s responsibility for non-conforming goods, but the allocation of risk can affect particular aspects of the dispute.<\/p>\n

                              Article 611 of the Chinese Civil Code expressly states that the transfer of risk of damage or loss does not affect the buyer’s right to claim contractual liability where the seller has not performed in accordance with the agreement.<\/p>\n

                              13. A Practical Way to Structure Your Refund Demand<\/h3>\n

                              A demand is stronger when it explains the legal and factual basis for the amount requested.<\/p>\n

                              Instead of sending only \u201cThe goods are defective. Refund us immediately,\u201d organize the claim around five points:<\/p>\n

                              First, identify the order.<\/strong> State the contract date, product description, quantity, price, and payment status.<\/p>\n

                              Second, identify the breach.<\/strong> Specify the agreed requirement and the actual failure. Attach the relevant inspection or testing evidence.<\/p>\n

                              Third, explain the consequences.<\/strong> Describe why the defect prevents use, reduces value, creates safety concerns, or causes additional costs.<\/p>\n

                              Fourth, state the remedy.<\/strong> Explain why you seek a full refund, partial refund, replacement, repair, or compensation. If you seek termination, identify the basis for saying that the breach justifies it.<\/p>\n

                              Fifth, set a reasonable response deadline.<\/strong> Request a written response and explain that unresolved claims may be pursued through the dispute-resolution mechanism in the contract.<\/p>\n

                              The demand should be consistent with the evidence. Exaggerated allegations or an unrealistic deadline can make a reasonable claim harder to resolve.<\/p>\n

                              14. What If the Manufacturer Refuses to Refund?<\/h3>\n

                              If direct negotiation fails, review the dispute-resolution clause before deciding what to do next.<\/p>\n

                              The contract may specify Chinese court litigation, arbitration, a particular arbitral institution, or another dispute-resolution arrangement. The proper route depends on the wording of the clause, the parties, and the applicable law.<\/p>\n

                              It is also important to identify the correct legal entity. The company that negotiated with you, the company that received payment, and the factory that manufactured the products may not be the same entity.<\/p>\n

                              Before spending heavily on proceedings, assess:<\/p>\n

                                \n
                              • The strength of the evidence.<\/li>\n
                              • The amount realistically recoverable.<\/li>\n
                              • The identity and location of the contracting party.<\/li>\n
                              • The dispute-resolution clause.<\/li>\n
                              • Relevant time limits.<\/li>\n
                              • The manufacturer’s financial condition and assets.<\/li>\n
                              • The likely cost and duration of enforcement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                A favorable judgment or arbitral award is not the same as actual recovery. For a substantial claim, the manufacturer’s ability to satisfy an award may be just as important as the merits of the case.<\/p>\n

                                15. When Is a Refund Claim Stronger Than a Repair Claim?<\/h3>\n

                                There is no universal formula, but a refund claim is generally more persuasive when the evidence shows that correction is not a reasonable solution.<\/p>\n

                                Factors that may support seeking termination and a refund include:<\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                • The defect defeats the essential purpose of the contract.<\/li>\n
                                • The products fail a mandatory technical or safety requirement.<\/li>\n
                                • The manufacturer cannot credibly correct the problem.<\/li>\n
                                • Repeated repairs have failed.<\/li>\n
                                • The proposed replacement would arrive too late to meet the agreed commercial purpose.<\/li>\n
                                • The manufacturer has refused to perform a meaningful corrective obligation.<\/li>\n
                                • The contract expressly provides a relevant refund or termination remedy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                  By contrast, if the defect is minor, readily repairable, and does not prevent the products from being used, a full refund may be harder to justify.<\/p>\n

                                  The objective is not to demand the most aggressive remedy in every case. It is to select a remedy supported by the contract, the evidence, and the actual consequences of the breach.<\/p>\n

                                  Conclusion: Defective Custom Products Do Not Automatically Mean a Full Refund<\/h3>\n

                                  When a Chinese manufacturer produces defective custom products, the buyer may have grounds to seek a refund, replacement, repair, price reduction, or compensation. But the appropriate remedy depends on the facts and the applicable legal framework.<\/p>\n

                                  The most important distinction is between products that are merely imperfect and products whose defects prevent the contract from achieving its purpose.<\/p>\n

                                  A buyer considering a refund should establish what was agreed, document what was delivered, assess whether the defects can be corrected, calculate the resulting losses, and review the contract’s termination and dispute-resolution provisions.<\/p>\n

                                  For foreign companies, early legal assessment can help avoid two costly mistakes: accepting an inadequate repair proposal when the breach is fundamental, or demanding a full refund when the evidence supports only a narrower remedy.<\/p>\n

                                  The key question is not simply whether the products are defective. It is whether the defects, the contract, and the available evidence justify a refund\u2014and how that claim can realistically be enforced against the Chinese manufacturer.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                  <\/p>\n

                                  \n

                                  What Foreign Buyers Should Know About Linyi Suppliers<\/h3>\n

                                  The Linyi market includes businesses involved in wood products, building materials, machinery and wholesale trade. Common commercial problems can include quality disputes, quantity disputes, delivery problems and payment disputes. In a dispute, contracts, purchase orders, technical specifications, inspection records, invoices, payment records and correspondence may become important evidence. For wholesale, building-materials, wood-product and machinery transactions, buyers should pay particular attention to product specifications, quantities, inspection records, delivery arrangements and the identity of the actual contracting supplier.<\/p>\n

                                  The city\u2019s position within Shandong and its connection with a broad wholesale and manufacturing network serving domestic and export markets can provide useful commercial context when evaluating a supplier relationship. Local characteristics do not determine the outcome of a dispute.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

                                  <\/p>\n

                                  <\/p>\n

                                  \n

                                  Before Taking Action Against a Supplier in Linyi<\/h3>\n

                                  For an overseas buyer, a practical first step is usually to identify the correct Chinese contracting party and preserve evidence showing what was ordered, what was paid and what was delivered. Depending on the contract and dispute, the next step may involve a demand, settlement negotiations, arbitration, litigation or enforcement.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

                                  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                  When sourcing from Linyi, overseas companies should consider not only the contract itself but also the type of local supplier, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-supplier-disputes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyuandassociates.com\/linyi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}